top of page

The Cost of War: Indo-Pak Tensions & the Mental Health of Citizens

The relationship between India and Pakistan has long been characterized by tension, mistrust, and recurring conflict. In recent weeks, a new wave of hostilities has stirred deep anxiety across both nations. While the focus of media coverage often lies on military operations, political blame games, and strategic responses, what often goes unnoticed is the deep psychological impact these tensions have on the everyday lives of citizens. War is not only fought on the battlefield; it is also experienced within the minds and hearts of people living under the shadow of potential violence. The fear of escalation, the stress of uncertainty, and the trauma of conflict reach far beyond borders and bombs, touching homes, families, and individuals in profound and lasting ways.


ree

As military operations unfolded and tensions intensified along the Line of Control, the psychological strain on border communities escalated rapidly. Families were forced to flee their homes, leaving behind possessions, routines, and a sense of stability. Inhabitants of villages caught in the line of fire experience a unique kind of fear—one that is persistent, unpredictable, and inescapable. The sound of gunfire, the threat of sudden shelling, and the uncertainty of survival create an environment of chronic stress. Children who should be playing in school grounds are instead exposed to sounds of destruction, leading to anxiety, confusion, and behavioral disturbances. Many grow up in a psychological state of fight-or-flight, with their nervous systems constantly on edge, even in moments of temporary calm.


While the most intense experiences are felt near the borders, citizens in urban areas are far from immune to the psychological effects of such escalations. As news spreads rapidly through television and social media, people thousands of miles away from the conflict zone begin to experience emotional responses to the unfolding crisis. Fear for the future, concerns for national security, and empathy for those directly affected combine to create an atmosphere of collective anxiety. In these moments, the human mind struggles to process the volume and intensity of distressing information. As uncertainty grows, so does the sense of helplessness. When people feel they have no control over what is happening, they often internalize fear, which can manifest as insomnia, irritability, lack of concentration, or even physical symptoms such as fatigue or chest pain.


The psychological impact is particularly significant for the younger generation, who are deeply connected to digital platforms and often consume information without context or balance. Social media can intensify and spread fear and misinformation, leading to confusion and panic. Young people may begin to internalize narratives of enmity and hatred without fully understanding the historical, political, or social complexities of the conflict. Repeated exposure to emotionally charged content and images of violence can result in emotional numbness, desensitization, or in some cases, trauma responses. In the long run, this not only impacts their mental health but also shapes their worldviews, potentially reinforcing divisions rather than encouraging peace and understanding.


Families of military personnel face another layer of emotional turmoil. As operations intensify, they live with the fear of receiving bad news at any moment. The psychological toll on spouses, children, and parents of soldiers is immense, even if rarely acknowledged. Every moment is filled with anticipation, and the pressure of remaining strong for the sake of loved ones can itself become overwhelming. Children may struggle with the absence of a parent, while partners deal with emotional isolation and unresolved fear. These experiences are often internalized, creating long-term emotional strain that may lead to depression, anxiety disorders, or post-traumatic stress if not addressed properly.


Collective memory and intergenerational trauma also play an important role in shaping the psychological experience of war in both India and Pakistan. The partition of 1947 was one of the most traumatic events in South Asian history, and the memory of that division still lingers in the psyche of millions. Even today, families carry stories of violence, displacement, and loss. These stories are passed down from generation to generation, reinforcing a sense of mistrust and fear of the "other side." When fresh conflict arises, it often triggers unresolved emotional wounds in older generations and reinforces inherited fears in younger ones. This cycle of trauma, if left unaddressed, continues to fuel the psychological divide between the two nations.


Public discourse during such periods often becomes polarized and emotionally charged. Nationalism rises, and calls for unity are frequently accompanied by hostile rhetoric. In such an environment, people may suppress their personal fears or moral concerns in favor of group identity. The pressure to conform to a dominant national narrative can isolate individuals who feel conflicted or anxious about the situation. This internal conflict—between what one truly feels and what one believes they should feel—can lead to cognitive dissonance, emotional suppression, and increased psychological distress. The more emotionally charged the environment becomes, the more difficult it is for individuals to express vulnerability or seek help.


Despite the bleakness, it is important to recognize that the human psyche is resilient. Many people find ways to cope with the stress of war—through family support, community engagement, creative expression, or spiritual practices. Mental health professionals have increasingly emphasized the need for psychological first aid during conflict, especially for displaced populations and vulnerable groups. Counseling services, support groups, and helplines can play a vital role in helping people process their emotions and reduce the risk of long-term psychological damage. However, access to such services remains limited, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas. Addressing this gap requires not just policy changes but also a cultural shift in how mental health is viewed and prioritized.


Ultimately, the psychological cost of Indo-Pak tensions cannot be measured in numbers or headlines. It exists in the sleepless nights of a mother worried for her son, in the confused tears of a child unsure why he must leave his home, and in the silent fear of a young adult watching war unfold through a phone screen. Understanding and addressing these emotional realities is essential not just for healing, but for building a more peaceful and humane future. When nations talk about security and sovereignty, they must also consider the inner security of their people—the sense of safety, calm, and dignity that every human being deserves. Only then can peace be truly meaningful, not just as a diplomatic concept, but as a lived emotional experience.


Written by: Neharika Chhabria



May, 2025

 
 
bottom of page