top of page

People beyond the Memes: What we missed about that Coldplay Clip

They were just two people at a concert and what started as a 15-second video was soon everywhere. We didn’t know their names, their histories, or the conversations they shared in that moment. And yet, within hours, the internet had decided exactly who they were- assigning them characters in a made-up story, dissecting their expressions, mocking their interactions, reducing what might’ve been a deeply personal moment into an object of collective ridicule. Screenshots became memes. Speculation became certainty. What then followed were names, screenshots from LinkedIn and family photos. And in a matter of days, what had been an evening of music and maybe a misstep became a global online spectacle as strangers became comedians, analysts, and moral judges.


ree

At first, most of us laughed. It was just too easy - the zoom-ins, the dramatic voiceovers, the moralistic takes disguised as jokes. But as the days unfolded, something darker took root. People who weren’t even in the video - the wife, the child, the friends - were being tagged, blamed, pitied, and pulled into the centre of a storm they never asked for. The consequences of this public trial have been brutal. Not just humiliation or embarrassment, but actual, tangible loss – livelihoods and reputations - not because of a legal violation, but because public outrage demanded it. In any other circumstance, would we think it fair for someone to lose their job over a personal mistake that, while morally debatable, wasn’t illegal or professionally relevant? Do we believe that we should be held to the highest standard of moral purity in our workplaces? Or do we only demand that of people who get caught?


We need to pause here – was this more than just a ‘funny internet moment’? If we think about it, it’s a case study in how desensitized we’ve become to the human beings behind the pixels we consume. We no longer pause to ask: what if that was me? What if I was the one going through something raw and vulnerable, only to find my pain trending on social media? But at the same time, it is also worth introspecting: who benefits from this public shaming? Who does it help? And at what cost? Did we for once look beyond the memes and think about them as real people, with their own emotions and mental health?


There’s a certain glee that seems to accompany scandals like this, especially when they involve cheating or betrayal. But what we rarely speak about is how public takedowns blur the lines between accountability and cruelty. This wasn’t an exposé by a journalist uncovering corporate fraud. It was a video of two people who magnified through the lens of thousands who assumed the role of judge, jury, and executioner - without context, without nuance, and without a second thought about consequence. This isn't about whether they were right or wrong. This isn’t even about relationships. It’s about what we, as a society, do with the stories of others, especially when they’re handed to us without consent, context, or clarity. It's about how quickly we jump to judgment, and how little we consider the emotional debris we leave behind.


For the woman involved, the scrutiny has been particularly vicious. The same patriarchy that turns every misstep into a morality tale seems to be alive and well. Her looks have been dissected, her intentions questioned, and her family history unearthed. And all of it has happened under the guise of humour and outrage - often by people who claim to be progressive, who would never stand for this kind of treatment if it were happening to someone they knew personally. Let’s also talk about the child - whose face is now splashed across viral posts, not because he asked for it, but because we as a society are obsessed with framing every mistake in the most dramatic way possible. "Think of the child!" they say - and then go on to circulate his image, his name, his school, his parents' LinkedIn profiles, all in the name of internet justice. What does that do to him? To his friends? To his future?


Let us also take a moment to acknowledge what perhaps might be the most difficult truth: we don’t know the whole story. We never will. Relationships are complicated. People are flawed. And one 15-second video will never capture the full context of what led two people to that moment. But we behave as if it does. We declare them guilty - not just of infidelity, but of every possible failing we can imagine. We treat them as if they’re no longer human. Just content. Just cautionary tales. This kind of moral policing that we witnessed isn't justice, it is just a form of control. And, for those saying "they shouldn’t have done it" - fine, maybe they shouldn’t have. But does that mean they deserve to be hounded by the internet, haunted by their worst moment, and punished beyond proportion?


When the video broke out, some argued that “if you’re at a public event, you’re fair game.” But since when did attending a concert come with a waiver for dignity? Since when did a fleeting moment, captured through a stranger’s lens, mean forfeiting the right to not be globally humiliated? “Why were they in public if they didn’t want to be seen?” is a question that reeks of the same logic often used to justify invasions of privacy. We carry with us an entitlement we’ve developed around others’ personal stories. It’s eerily close to “she shouldn't have worn that” or “they should’ve kept their feelings private” - as if vulnerability in public spaces deserves punishment. As if we are owed explanation by default. Let’s not forget, being filmed at a concert and having your entire life dissected isn’t something most of us expect or prepare for. There’s a difference between accountability and public execution. And this incident has just gone on to show us how we, as a society, are getting disturbingly comfortable with the latter.


Virality is not neutral - it often comes with real, lasting psychological consequences. The people we turn into jokes don’t stop existing when the meme fades. They go to work the next day, they wake up to hundreds of messages, they receive judgment from their own circles who now think they know what happened. That kind of exposure - especially in moments of emotional distress - can lead to anxiety, depression, shame, withdrawal from social interaction and maybe even thoughts of self-harm or suicide. We don’t need clinical labels to understand this. We just need basic empathy.


Those who did try to question the nature of this public trial were met with chants of  “You’re being too sensitive,” and “It’s just a joke.” But what if it's not just a joke to the person on the other end? That’s the problem - we’ve normalized public shaming so much that we’ve forgotten there’s a line between commentary and cruelty, and between noticing a moment, and tearing someone apart over it.


Let us take a pause to also look beyond the couple involved for a moment and explore what this means for people with past traumas, experiences of social anxiety, or emotional wounds around public perception - this kind of spectacle isn’t just unpleasant, it’s triggering. Watching someone be deconstructed in real-time reminds many of their own most shameful moments. It reopens the wound of what it means to be misunderstood, misrepresented, and mocked for something personal.


What we witnessed, wasn’t humour, because humour without compassion is just cruelty wrapped in a punchline – it is not a free pass that most people have made it out to be. And when thousands of people participate, repost, and remix - it’s no longer light-hearted. It becomes collective bullying. Just because it’s digital doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt, and the people in the video and those around them still remain real people with real identities, unlike those hiding behind anonymized handles giving an online verdict. To be clear, this isn’t about cancelling laughter. Humour has its place because it helps us process and cope, but it must be rooted in kindness - not mockery. And humour certainly shouldn't come at the cost of someone else’s mental peace and emotions.


What followed this incident is something we should be collectively ashamed of, but there are some things we can learn from this moving forward, but first we need to ask ourselves who we become when we participate in these viral pile-ons. Are we holding people accountable? Or are we just feeding our need for entertainment, outrage, and superiority? And what happens when this kind of behaviour becomes the norm when every misstep, every imperfection, is captured, shared, and used to destroy? - We need to learn to resist the urge to repost without thinking, choose to pause before we comment, especially when we know nothing of the context, choose not to be part of the machine that turns real people into entertainment fodder, and most importantly, we need to reflect: how would I feel if that was me? My friend? My partner?


Because at the end of the day, none of us are immune to lapses in judgement. We all have messy moments. We’ve all had breakdowns, misunderstandings, and emotional outbursts. We may have also done things we wish weren’t captured or remembered. The only difference is that most of us may have had those moments in private. They didn’t. It's easy to condemn when it's not you on camera and to moralise when your mistakes haven’t gone viral. So keeping all of this in mind, at this juncture, the least we can offer now is the kind of compassion we hope we’d receive, if the roles were ever reversed.


Written by: Vedica Podar



July, 2025

 
 
bottom of page