top of page

Beyond Someone’s Daughter, Wife or Mother: The Emotional Toll of Patriarchy

2 days ago
7 min read

A woman can spend her entire life being defined by her relationship to someone else - her being someone's daughter, someone's sister, someone's wife, someone's mother. These relationships can be deeply meaningful, loving and central to who she is. While there is nothing inherently wrong with finding identity and joy in them, the problem begins when these become the only identities society is willing to recognise, and when, somewhere along the way, we forget that beneath all these relationships is a person who exists in her own right. A person with ambitions, preferences, fears, desires, boundaries, friendships, opinions, disappointments and dreams. A person who may want things that have nothing to do with being a daughter, wife or mother. A person whose life cannot be reduced to the roles she performs for other people or how she is related to them. A person who is someone too.



This is one of the quieter psychological consequences of patriarchy - it does not always announce itself through dramatic acts of oppression. Sometimes, it appears in the everyday expectation that a woman should explain where she is going, who she is with, when she will return, when she intends to marry, whether she plans to have children, why she works so much, why she does not work, why she comes home late, why she dresses a certain way, why she speaks too loudly, why she chooses to express her anger in a certain way, or why she has chosen a life that does not resemble the one others imagined for her.


Her life comes with a timeline, and there is often an invisible committee keeping score. By a certain age, she should be married. By another, she should have children. Her career should progress, but not so aggressively that it threatens her family role. She should be independent, but not so independent that she becomes difficult to control. She should be confident, but never intimidating. She should have opinions, but know when not to express them. She should protect the family's honour, absorb its emotional labour, maintain its relationships and accommodate everyone's needs, while somehow remaining endlessly pleasant throughout it all. And when she steps outside these prescribed boxes, the question is rarely, What does she want from her life?  It is more likely to be, What is wrong with her?


This is where patriarchy becomes a mental-health issue, not simply a question of social equality. When a person is repeatedly told that her worth is conditional on how well she fulfils other people's expectations, she can eventually begin to internalise those expectations herself. She may learn to monitor her behaviour constantly, anticipate judgement before it arrives, suppress her needs to avoid conflict and feel guilty whenever she chooses herself. Over time, autonomy can begin to feel like selfishness, setting a boundary can feel like disrespect, saying no can feel like letting someone down, pursuing an ambition can feel like neglecting the family, choosing not to marry can feel like failure, leaving an unhappy marriage can feel like bringing shame upon everyone, or wanting financial independence can be interpreted as rejecting family values. Even ordinary decisions can become emotionally exhausting when a woman has been taught that every choice she makes carries consequences not only for herself, but for the reputation and comfort of everyone around her.


There is a particularly damaging contradiction at the heart of this. Women are often told that the honour of an entire family rests on their behaviour, clothes, friendships, relationships, sexuality, choices, words, and movements, causing them to be subjected to extraordinary scrutiny because they are supposedly responsible for protecting the family's reputation. Yet when it comes to trusting women to make decisions about their own lives, that trust can disappear remarkably quickly. She can be trusted with everyone's honour, but not necessarily with her own life. Her judgement may be questioned because she is "too emotional." Her choices may be dismissed because she is "young." Her independence may be treated as rebellion. Her account of what happened to her may be doubted in favour of the word of a man, a husband, a relative, an authority figure or even a stranger. That contradiction takes a psychological toll.


Constant scrutiny can create a state of perpetual self-monitoring: Am I behaving appropriately? What will people think? Will this upset my family? Am I being too ambitious? Too outspoken? Too independent? Too old to be doing this? Too young to be making this decision? - When the possibility of judgement is always present, freedom becomes exhausting because every choice has to be negotiated internally before it can even be expressed externally.


This is not only about individual families. It is constantly reinforced by communities, institutions, workplaces, media, popular culture and social expectations that continue to define women through what they should be rather than who they are.


We tell women to have careers, but often expect them to carry the greater share of domestic responsibilities. We celebrate women who are financially independent, while continuing to judge them for prioritising work. We encourage them to speak up, but label them difficult when they do. We tell them to know their worth, while scrutinising their appearance, relationships, age and choices. We tell them they can have everything, but rarely ask who is expected to absorb the invisible labour required to make that possible. The result can be a life spent performing a version of womanhood that is acceptable to everyone else while becoming increasingly disconnected from the question of what the woman herself actually wants.


This is also why the language around "smashing the patriarchy" can make some people deeply uncomfortable. Perhaps part of that discomfort comes from what the phrase asks us to confront. It is not simply asking for individual women to be treated a little more kindly. It asks us to question the structures and assumptions that determine who gets authority, who gets freedom, who has to explain themselves and whose choices require permission. It asks uncomfortable questions. Who gets to decide what a woman should do with her life? Why does her marriage require so much collective investment? Why is her sexuality treated as a matter of family honour? Why is her mobility monitored? Why is her anger supposed to be measured? Why are women expected to report to the men in their homes about where they are going and when they will return? Why is financial dependence so often treated as a natural feature of family life rather than something that can leave people vulnerable to control? Why are women expected to carry the emotional wellbeing of everyone around them while their own needs are treated as secondary? And perhaps, for some people, challenging these arrangements feels threatening precisely because the arrangements benefit them.


Patriarchy does not survive only because people consciously believe women are inferior. It also survives through familiarity, convenience, power and inherited expectations. Some people benefit from having their authority unquestioned. Some benefit from women doing unpaid emotional and domestic labour. Some benefit from women being taught to accommodate, forgive, remain silent and prioritise everyone else's comfort. Some benefit from a social system in which women are more heavily scrutinised and therefore easier to control. When those privileges are questioned, equality can sometimes be misinterpreted as oppression. But asking for women's autonomy is not asking for men to lose their humanity. Asking women to have financial independence is not an attack on family. Asking women to make decisions about their own bodies and lives is not an attack on relationships. Smashing patriarchy is not about hating men or dismantling every family structure, but rather about dismantling the assumption that gender should determine who gets to exercise authority, who gets to make decisions and whose life belongs to whom.


It is also worth recognising that rigid gender expectations can harm men, too. Patriarchy can teach men that they must always be providers, suppress vulnerability, demonstrate authority and avoid appearing weak. But acknowledging this should not obscure the particular ways in which women have historically been denied autonomy, credibility, opportunity and freedom.


For women, the psychological consequences can be profound. When choices are repeatedly constrained, identity can become entangled with obligation. When ambition is constantly negotiated against expectations of femininity, women may hesitate before pursuing opportunities. When financial independence is discouraged, leaving harmful situations can become harder. When emotional accommodation is treated as a woman's responsibility, resentment and exhaustion can accumulate quietly. When every deviation from the expected path is treated as evidence that something is wrong with her, she may eventually begin believing it herself.


Perhaps one of the most important acts of resistance, therefore, is not simply giving women permission to occupy more space, but rather helping create a world in which they do not have to ask permission in the first place. A woman should not have to justify wanting a career. She should not have to defend choosing motherhood or choosing not to become a mother. She should not have to explain why she wants to marry, why she does not want to marry, why she wants to leave a marriage or why she wants to live alone. She should not have to earn the right to have boundaries. She should not have to sacrifice her mental health to prove that she is a good daughter, wife or mother. And most importantly, she should not have to become indispensable to everyone else before she is allowed to matter to herself.


There is nothing wrong with being someone's daughter, someone's wife, someone's mother or sister. These relationships can be some of the most beautiful and meaningful parts of a woman's life, but they are relationships, not definitions. They should add to who she is, not replace her identity.


A woman is someone's daughter, but she is also herself. Someone's wife, but also herself. Someone's mother, but also herself. Someone's sister, but also herself. Not because those relationships don't matter, but because she matters outside them too. She has a mind that deserves to be heard, a body that belongs to her, ambitions that deserve room, boundaries that deserve respect and a future that does not have to fit neatly into someone else's timeline. She does not exist only to be needed, protected, obeyed, sacrificed for or responsible for everyone else's happiness. She is a whole person. And perhaps that is one of the most important things patriarchy has taught women to forget: that before she "belongs" to anyone else, she belongs to herself.



Written by: Vedica Podar



September, 2026

 
 
bottom of page